Is arbitration before a foreign institution in China on the way?

By Vincent Mu, Martin Hu & Partners
0
1702

Recently, a reply given by the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) in March 2013 came to light in a publicly available publication (Min Si Ta Zi [2013] No. 13). The reply expressly recognises the validity of an arbitration agreement providing for “a foreign arbitration institution conducting arbitration in China” for first time.

牟笛 Vincent Mu 胡光律师事务所 资深律师 Senior Associate Martin Hu & Partners
牟笛
Vincent Mu
胡光律师事务所
资深律师
Senior Associate
Martin Hu & Partners

In the case, Anhui LD Packing Printing and BP Agnati SRL provided as follows in their arbitration agreement: “Any dispute shall be referred to the ICC International Court of Arbitration … jurisdiction [place of arbitration] shall be Shanghai, China”. That means the ICC International Court of Arbitration would hear a case in Shanghai.

Earlier appearance

In fact, an arbitration agreement with “foreign arbitration institution plus arbitration in China” made its first appearance much earlier than this. In 2004, in the arbitration agreement validity case between Züblin International GmbH and Wuxi Woke General Engineering Rubber, an arbitration clause specifying “Arbitration: ICC Rules, Shanghai shall apply” was involved.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们

Martin_Hu_&_Partners_logo

胡光律师事务所

上海市芳甸路1155号浦东嘉里城办公楼8楼

8/ Floor, Kerry Parkside Office

1155 Fangdian Road, Pudong

Shanghai, China

邮编 Postal code: 201204

电话 Tel: +86 21 5010 1666

传真 Fax: +86 21 5010 1222

www.mhplawyer.com

胡光 Martin Hu

电子信箱 E-mail: martin.hu@mhplawyer.com

牟笛 Vincent Mu

电子信箱 E-mail: vincent.mu@mhplawyer.com