The 46th amendment to India’s constitution, in 1982, inserted article 366(29A), which defined purchase/sales of goods and extended the scope for levy of value-added tax (VAT)/central sales tax (CST) to the “transfer of right to use goods”. An immediate issue was whether intellectual property (IP) is goods, and exploitation/transfer of IP as a transaction attracts VAT. Much later, the levy of service tax was extended to include transactions involving “temporary transfers”, and “permitting the use or enjoyment” of IP.

The issue of what levy would be applicable has arisen owing to the failure of enactments to clarify what constitutes “transfer of right to use”, and further, due to the divergence in the philosophy adopted by the legislature as against that of the judiciary in interpreting the statutory provisions.
In situations involving licensing of IP (but not an assignment) the issue is determining the levy applicable and the test to be applied for this purpose. VAT being a state levy and service tax being a central levy adds to the complexity.
You must be a
subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber
to read this content, please
subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe
today.
For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.
你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员。
Economic Laws Practice is a full-service law firm with headquarters in Mumbai and offices in New Delhi, Pune, Ahmedabad and Bangalore. Ranjeet Mahtani is a senior associate and Sweta Rajan is an associate at the firm.
1502 A Wing, Dalamal Towers
Free Press Journal Road
Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021, India
Tel: +91 22 6636 7000
Fax: +91 22 6636 7172
Email: RanjeetMahtani@elp-in.com
SwetaRajan@elp-in.com