On 15-16 March, the International Bar Association, the Bar Association of India and the Confederation of Indian Industry, among others, held an International Conference on India’s New Merger Notification Regime.
Leading competition law practitioners and regulators from the EU, US and Canada shared their experiences and officers of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) shared their thoughts on the merger control implementing rules.
During pre-conference meetings on 15 March, an interesting question was raised: What would be the legal implications of deferring the application of the substantive merger control rules in sections 5 and 6 of the Competition Act, 2002, while allowing the remainder of the act to enter into force? While the prospect of a deferment might delight the innocent, the consequences of such an initiative should make the bravest cringe.
You must be a
subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber
to read this content, please
subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe
today.
For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.
你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员。
Anand S Pathak is partner-in-charge of P&A Law Offices in New Delhi. He can be contacted at apathak@palawoffices.com.
P&A Law Offices
1st Floor, Dr Gopal Das Bhavan
28 Barakhamba Road
New Delhi, 110 001
India
Tel: +91 11 4139 3939
Fax: +91 11 2335 3761
Email: apathak@palawoffices.com