{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Law.asia","provider_url":"https:\/\/beta2.law.asia\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Putro","author_url":"https:\/\/beta2.law.asia\/zh-hans\/author\/van_author2\/","title":"\u7981\u8bc9\u4ee4\u2014\u2014\u5c0f\u7c73\u516c\u53f8\u548c\u4ea4\u4e92\u6570\u5b57\u516c\u53f8\u7ea0\u7eb7\u7684\u542f\u793a","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"yPeUYvdHtP\"><a href=\"https:\/\/beta2.law.asia\/zh-hans\/anti-suit-injunctions-xiaomi-v-interdigital-dispute\/\">\u7981\u8bc9\u4ee4\u2014\u2014\u5c0f\u7c73\u516c\u53f8\u548c\u4ea4\u4e92\u6570\u5b57\u516c\u53f8\u7ea0\u7eb7\u7684\u542f\u793a<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/beta2.law.asia\/zh-hans\/anti-suit-injunctions-xiaomi-v-interdigital-dispute\/embed\/#?secret=yPeUYvdHtP\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;\u7981\u8bc9\u4ee4\u2014\u2014\u5c0f\u7c73\u516c\u53f8\u548c\u4ea4\u4e92\u6570\u5b57\u516c\u53f8\u7ea0\u7eb7\u7684\u542f\u793a&#8221; &#8212; Law.asia\" data-secret=\"yPeUYvdHtP\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,d){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(d.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=d.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=d.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),l=0;l<n.length;l++)n[l].style.display=\"none\";for(l=0;l<i.length;l++)if(r=i[l],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=d.createElement(\"a\"),a=d.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,!o.test(a.protocol));else if(a.host===s.host)if(d.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),d.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=d.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/beta2.law.asia\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Anti-suit-injunctions-and-the-Xiaomi-v-InterDigital-dispute-Huang-Wei-and-Yin-Bei.jpg","thumbnail_width":900,"thumbnail_height":601,"description":"\u8fd1\u5e74\u6765\uff0c\u5b9e\u65bd\u8005\u548c\u6743\u5229\u4eba\u56f4\u7ed5\u6807\u51c6\u5fc5\u8981\u4e13\u5229\uff08\u201cSEP\u201d\uff09\u5728\u5168\u7403\u8fdb\u884c\u8bc9\u8bbc\u5df2\u53d1\u5c55\u4e3a\u5e38\u6001\u3002\u5f53\u6743\u5229\u4eba\u901a\u8fc7\u7981\u8bc9\u4ee4\u5728\u6b27\u7f8e\u7b49\u57df\u5916\u6218\u573a\u5236\u7ea6\u4e2d\u56fd\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u56fd\u5185\u8bc9\u8bbc\u884c\u4e3a\u65f6\uff0c\u534e\u4e3a\u516c\u53f8\u548c\u5c0f\u7c73\u516c\u53f8\u4ea6\u4e8e\u4eca\u5e74\u5728\u4e2d\u56fd\u63d0\u51fa\u7981\u8bc9\u4ee4\u7533\u8bf7\u3002"}