Tag: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court, in Shriram EPC Ltd and Anor v Gaja Trustee Co Pvt Ltd, held that it would not be right for the court to foist unwarranted arbitration on the parties when clearly on the facts the cause was a dead letter

The Bombay HC ruled that an arbitrator's acceptance of a brief from a law firm representing a party in an arbitration won't disqualify them if it's unrelated to the case

The Bombay High Court recently heard a petition under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

The Bombay High Court has held that as a general proposition of law, in the case of the sale of an immovable property, there is no assumption as to time being the essence of the contract

Juris Corp successfully represented the Competition Commission of India (CCI) in opposing the writ petitions filed by three broadcasting companies before the Bombay High Court

How the Enforcement Directorate turned into a veritable bogeyman for India Inc

Trilegal assisted Wipro Consumer Care to uphold an injunction in a commercial intellectual property suit involving its flagship soap brand Santoor being disparaged in a Sebamed advertising campaign by rival company USV

Mumbai-based law firm Solomon & Co Advocates & Solicitors, founded in 1909, elevated associate partners Soniya Putta, Shruti Maniar and Jacqueline Aikin to the firm’s partnership

In a Supreme Court judgment it was held that section 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 can be used to record reasons for findings already produced in an award

India’s antitrust probe into the alleged collusion over fees charged by debt trustees of the State Bank of India, Axis Bank and IDBI Bank took a back seat following an intervention by the Bombay High Court after the banks challenged the jurisdiction of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) in April this year

The number of criminal cases filed against cheque defaulters has overwhelmed India’s judicial system. One obvious solution is to decriminalise what is often a civil dispute, but lawyers aren’t convinced that’s the answer. George W Russell reports