The Supreme Court in its recent judgment in Subramanian Swamy v Union of India, Ministry of Law & Ors, considered the constitutional validity of the archaic sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).

The petitions, filed by leaders such as Swamy of the Bharatiya Janata Party, Congress Vice-President Rahul Gandhi and Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, sought to decriminalize defamation and strike down sections 499 and 500 on the grounds that they are “outmoded” and contrary to the right to freedom of speech and expression, enshrined in article 19 of the constitution of India. Moreover, the petitioners contended that having a criminal penalty for a wrong that can be dealt with satisfactorily by civil law is a disproportionate restriction on free speech.
Article 19(1)(a) of the constitution guarantees all Indian citizens the right to freedom of speech and expression. Article 19(2) allows the state to make laws which impose reasonable restrictions on this right in the interests of, among others, the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the state and public order, decency or morality, and defamation.
You must be a
subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber
to read this content, please
subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe
today.
For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.
你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员。
Vivek Vashi is the mainstay of the litigation team at Bharucha & Partners, where Shaheda Madraswala is an associate.