In 2018, the author encountered a problem that is common in litigation when dealing with a complicated administrative litigation dispute, i.e. the plaintiff (the owner) did not recognize that the defendant (expropriation department) had served it with relevant documents.
Partner
Boss & Young
Since the implementation of the new Administrative Procedure Law (the first amendment) in 2014, the expropriation, expropriation decision and its compensation decision dispute had been explicitly included in the scope of administrative litigations. Therefore, the service of process in the above-mentioned case leads directly to a new problem: service of process in administrative procedures.
Among the major administrative laws in China, such as the Administrative Law, the Administrative Review Law, the Administrative Penalty Law and the Administrative Compulsion Law, there is no specific provision on service of process. According to the provisions of the above-mentioned administrative law, provisions on service of process of Civil Procedure Law could be applied.
You must be a
subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber
to read this content, please
subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe
today.
For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.
你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章，欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员。
Peter Li is a partner at Boss & Young in Shanghai
Boss & Young
12th-15th Floor, 100 Bund Square, 100 South Zhongshan Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai
www.boss-young.comContact details:
Tel: +8621 2316 9090
Fax: +8621 2316 9000
E-Mail:ligang@boss-young.com
