Roche-Cipla case underlines value of interim injunctions

By Manisha Singh Nair, Lex Orbis
0
322

The enforcement of intellectual property (IP) rights can prove to be a lengthy and tedious process, during which rights may continue to be infringed and damages accrued. In order to protect the rights of the litigators during a trial to decide upon an alleged violation, relief in the form of an interim injunction may be applied for. If such an application is successful, an order for an interim injunction will be passed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, and the injunction will remain in force until the trial of the main case concludes.

Manisha-Singh-Nair-Partner-Lex-Orbis-Intellectual-Property-Practice
Manisha Singh Nair
Partner
Lex Orbis Intellectual Property Practice

Order XXXIX Rule 1 lists cases in which a temporary injunction may be granted. Such cases include any suit where it is proved by affidavit or otherwise:

(a) that any property in dispute in a suit is in danger of being wasted, damaged or alienated by any party to the suit, or wrongfully sold in execution of a decree, or

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们

Manisha Singh Nair is a partner at Lex Orbis, an intellectual property practice law firm headquartered in New Delhi.

Lex-Orbis-logo

709/710 Tolstoy House, 15-17 Tolstoy Marg

New Delhi – 110 001

India

电话 Tel: +91 11 2371 6565

传真 Fax: +91 11 2371 6556

网站 Website: www.lexorbis.com

电子信箱 E-mail: mail@lexorbis.com