The Allahabad High Court, in Glyph International Ltd v Union of India and Ors, recently upheld the constitutional validity of the provisions dealing with the “reverse charge mechanism” for services, contained in the Indian service tax enactment. Under this mechanism, service recipients in India are required to pay service tax in respect of an “import” of taxable service from a service provider outside India.

Senior associate
Economic Laws
Practice
Depending on the taxable service in question, “import” is determined by one of three criteria: (i) location of immovable property in relation to which the service is provided within India; (ii) place of physical performance (partial or whole) of the service within India; or (iii) location of the service recipient being India.
The petitioner in this case contended that the reverse charge mechanism created an “artificial” taxing event for services provided outside India, which exceeded the geographical boundary of the operation of the legislation. Such a levy could also give rise to double taxation of a single transaction by two countries.
You must be a
subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber
to read this content, please
subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe
today.
For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.
你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员。
Economic Laws Practice is a full-service law firm with headquarters in Mumbai and offices in New Delhi, Pune and Ahmedabad. Ranjeet Mahtani, a senior associate at the firm, and Divya Jeswant, an associate, can be reached at ranjeetmahtani@elp-in.com and divyajeswant@elp-in.com.
1502 A Wing, Dalamal Towers
Free Press Journal Road
Nariman Point, Mumbai 400021, India
Tel: +91 22 6636 7000
Fax: +91 22 6636 7172
Email: RanjeetMahtani@elp-in.com
DivyaJeswant@elp-in.com