The emerging role of know-how and innovative ideas in the success of companies in India has resulted in an increasing reliance on restrictive covenants, primarily aimed at preventing present and former employees from disseminating sensitive information to the detriment of the employer.
Restrictive covenants in employment contracts can be contentious, post cessation of employment, since they often conflict with section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which restricts agreements in restraint of trade (and thus non-compete provisions post cessation of employment). Courts in India have increasingly upheld the validity of such restrictive covenants and enforced them.

Partner
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
In a leading decision in this regard, Delhi High Court in Burlington Home Shopping v Rajnish Chibber (1995) held that a list of customers prepared by the plaintiff company amounted to a trade secret, and granted an injunction restricting a former employee of the company who had been using the list (identically same) to set up his own clientele in a similar business.
You must be a
subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber
to read this content, please
subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe
today.
For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.
你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员。
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas is India’s largest full-service law firm. Manishi Pathak is a partner at the firm.