Due to the revision of macro policies, overcapacity in certain industries, financing and operational difficulties of industrial enterprises, etc., manufacturing-type foreign-invested enterprises recently are commonly facing the problem of domestic buyers defaulting on their payments.
Considering the co-operative relationship, the seller will first send a collection letter. As such a letter can signal the limitation of actions, it is of major significance in transactions that span a relatively long period of time. In court, if the defaulting party bases its defence on the limitation of actions, a dispute will inevitably arise ranging from whether the letter was served to the content of the served letter.

Associate
Martin Hu & Partners
Service of collection letters
How does a collecting party show that it has sent the defaulting party the letter, and what does it do if the defaulting party claims that the contents of the letter are not those of a collection letter? With respect to reminders, the Supreme People’s Court takes a stance of presumed service, namely, the reminding party needs to evidence the content and mailing of the reminder, not due delivery.
You must be a
subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber
to read this content, please
subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe
today.
For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.
你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员。
Blake Yang is an associate at Martin Hu & Partners
8/ Floor, Kerry Parkside Office
1155 Fangdian Road, Pudong
Shanghai, China
Postal code: 201204
Tel: +86 21 5010 1666
Fax: +86 21 5010 1222
www.mhplawyer.com
Martin Hu
E-mail: martin.hu@mhplawyer.com
Blake Yang
E-mail: blake.yang@mhplawyer.com