Jurisdiction of a court in arbitration proceedings

By Krrishan Singhania and Ranbir Krishan,Singhania & Co
0
1434

Arecent judgment by the Supreme Court of India has raised an interesting issue of jurisdiction based on the case of Shivnath Rai Harnarain (India) Ltd v M/s AG Abdul Rehman.

The parties had entered into an agreement which contained a clause that provided for the settlement of disputes through the Indian Council of Arbitration in Delhi. Both parties agreed that if a dispute were to arise, they would resolve it either in Singapore or the UK, and allow the arbitration agreement to be governed by Indian law.

Krrishan Singhania Partner Singhania & Co
Krrishan Singhania
Partner
Singhania & Co

In an attempt to resolve a dispute that had arisen, the parties, through a settlement agreement, mutually appointed Samuel J Marshall as the sole arbitrator and further agreed that the agreement would be governed by Indian law.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们

Krrishan Singhania is the managing partner and Ranbir Krishan is an attorney at Singhania & Co, a Mumbai-based law firm. Singhania has 20 years of experience in some of the firm’s core practice areas, which include arbitration, litigation and dispute resolution, aviation, and intellectual property.

Singhania_&_Co_Logo_2

Suite 102-103, Jolly Maker Chambers

II Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021

India

Tel: + 91 22 2202 0320/21/22

Fax: + 91 22 2202 0060

Email: mumbai@singhanialaw.com