Judgment facilitates the export of IP

By Vicky Stilwell, Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs
0
437

Chinese companies are searching the globe for technology. A recent court judgment in South Africa means that exchange control approval for the export of intellectual property from the country is no longer required.

In March, the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled in the case of Oilwell (Pty) Ltd v Protec International Ltd & Others on the issue of the assignment of IP from a South African resident or entity to a non-resident or foreign entity. In particular, the court ruled on whether approval under regulation 10(1)(c) of the Exchange Control Regulations is required for such transactions.

Vicky Stilwell, Director 合伙人, Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs
Vicky Stilwell
Director
Edward Nathan
Sonnenbergs

Regulation 10(1)(c) imposes restrictions on the export of capital and states that “no person shall, except with permission granted by the Treasury and in accordance with such conditions as the Treasury may impose … enter into any transaction whereby capital or any right to capital is directly or indirectly exported from the Republic”.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们

Vicky Stilwell is a director at Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs

Johannesburg

150 West Street

Sandton

Johannesburg

South Africa

2196

Tel: +27 11 269 7400

Fax: +27 21 269 7899

E-mail: info@ens.co.za

www.ens.co.za