Dilemma of competition restriction while an employee is employed

By Felix Wu, Xin Bai Law Firm
0
1656

Article 23 (2) of the Employment Contract Law specifies that an employer can specify with a worker who bears a confidentiality obligation a non-compete clause and liquidated damages for breach of the non-complete provision in his or her employment contract or a non-disclosure agreement.

吴法全 Felix Wu 信栢律师事务所 高级律师 Senior Attorney Xin Bai Law Firm
Felix Wu
Senior Attorney
Xin Bai Law Firm

Article 24 further specifies the persons to whom such a competition restriction applies, and the terms, and the second paragraph of that article specifies that the non-compete term may not exceed two years after the termination or ending of the employment contract.

Dilemma faced by an employer. That the above-mentioned non-compete term commences to count upon termination or ending of the employment contract is the usual understanding and expectation of the public. However, in practice, a client that the author advised ran into a rather awkward situation; the company discovered that one of its employees in a sales position had concurrently been working for a company in the same industry for several years, and despite its having executed a non-compete agreement with that employee, it did not seem to have any way of sanctioning that employee or recovering its losses, other than dismissing that employee.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们

Felix Wu is a senior attorney at Xin Bai Law Firm

Xin-Bai-Law-Firm 信栢律师事务所

Room 1203, 12/F, Infinitus Tower
168 Hu Bin Road, Huangpu District
Shanghai 200021, PRC
Tel: +86 21 5368 4111
Fax: +86 21 5368 4112
E-mail:
felix.wu@xinbailaw.com

www.xinbailaw.com