The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has levied penalties in two recent cases concerning common business practices. In both cases the penalties could have been avoided had the (inadverdent) acquirer/pledgor been aware of the requirements of the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011 (takeover code), and the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 1992. However, even seasoned practitioners at times can overlook the finer nuances of the compliance requirements.
Invocation of pledged shares
In a recent order, the adjudicating officer (AO) levied a penalty of ₹1 million (US$16,600) on the promoter shareholders/pledgors (noticees) for delay in making disclosures relating to a change in their shareholding as required by the takeover code and the insider trading regulations. The change in the noticees’ shareholding was as a result of invocation of pledge by the pledgee.

The AO did not accept the noticees’ argument that the pledgee invoked the pledged shares without any intimation to the pledgor.
You must be a
subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber
to read this content, please
subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe
today.
For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.
你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员。
Suhail Nathani is a partner and Yogesh Chande is an associate partner at Economic Laws Practice. This article is intended for informational purposes and does not constitute a legal opinion or advice.
109 A Wing, Dalamal Towers
Free Press Journal Road
Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021, India
Tel: +91 22 6636 7000
Fax: +91 22 6636 7172
Email: SuhailNathani@elp-in.com
YogeshChande@elp-in.com
Mumbai | New Delhi | Ahmedabad | Pune | Bengaluru | Chennai