Exploring the system of litigation for dissolution of companies

By Shi Anning, Dacheng Law Offices
0
1949

The Company Law establishes a judicial system of litigation for companies’ dissolution in mainland China. The trigger for such legal actions is a serious and unbreakable “company deadlock”. In the Provisions for Causes of Action in Civil Cases, the Supreme People’s Court classifies it as cause of action No. 263, a “company dissolution dispute”.

Entities involved

A company deadlock is a dispute situation in which a company’s decision making mechanism breaks down due to a conflict among shareholders or directors.

The plaintiff in a legal action for a company’s dissolution is generally a shareholder that finds it impossible to exercise its decision making rights or control. Although such actions result from a dispute among shareholders or directors, the defendant must be the company itself, not the shareholder or director with which the plaintiff is in conflict. Such shareholder or director may be named as a third party or added by the court as a materially interested “third party”.

师安宁 Shi Anning 北京大成律师事务所 高级合伙人 Senior Partner Dacheng Law Offices
师安宁
Shi Anning
北京大成律师事务所
高级合伙人
Senior Partner
Dacheng Law Offices

The claim of the party seeking dissolution usually falls along these lines: serious difficulties have arisen in the operation and management of the company; the company is caught in a deadlock that cannot be resolved by other means; and the party’s interests have suffered material harm. This party emphasises that the company’s governance and decision making mechanism have broken down, resulting in the company being caught in a deadlock. The defendant and its actual controlling shareholder or controller will generally defend that the company is in a good operating state – operating normally and making a profit; the company can pay its taxes normally and its employees normally, so the condition for dissolution of “serious difficulties have arisen in the company’s operation and management” is not constituted.

It can be seen that one of the core issues in a legal action for a company’s dissolution is how to correctly determine the essential meaning of the statutory condition, that is, “serious difficulties have arisen in the company’s operation and management”.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们

Shi Anning is a senior partner at Dacheng Law Offices in Beijing

(Dacheng Law Offices)

北京市朝阳区东大桥路9号侨福芳草地D座7层

邮编:100020

7/F, Building D, 9 Dongdaqiao Road

Chaoyang District, Beijing 100020, China

电话 Tel: +86 10 5813 7799

传真 Fax: +86 10 5813 7788

电子信箱 E-mail:

anning.shi@dachenglaw.com

www.dachenglaw.com